
Elizabeth Kirk, J.D.
Associate ScholarElizabeth R. Kirk is an Assistant Professor at The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law, where she also serves as Co-Director of its Center for Law and the Human Person.
Elizabeth’s scholarship focuses on law and the family, including issues such as parental rights, reproductive technologies, abortion jurisprudence, and child welfare and adoption. She also explores the relationship, both complementary and contrasting, between the Catholic intellectual tradition and law.
Her work has been published by the Notre Dame Law Review (forthcoming), the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy, and the Texas Review of Law & Politics, as well as by The Institute for Family Studies, Humanum, Public Discourse, and First Things.
Elizabeth previously served as a law clerk for Judge Daniel A. Manion on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She holds an undergraduate degree cum laude in English Literature from the University of Missouri, a law degree magna cum laude from the University of Notre Dame and has done graduate studies in theology.
Elizabeth previously served as Director and Kowalski Chair of Catholic Thought at the Institute for Faith and Culture at the St. Lawrence Catholic Campus Center at the University of Kansas (2019-2020), as associate director of the University of Notre Dame Center for Ethics & Culture (2005-2011), and as a resident fellow in cultural and legal studies at the Stein Center for Social Research at Ave Maria University (2012-2016).
Elizabeth has a demonstrated commitment to promoting the dignity of human life, having served in various capacities with pro-life institutions and ministries for over twenty years. Most notably, in 2010, along with University of Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture Director David Solomon, Elizabeth founded the Vita Institute, an intensive interdisciplinary training program for leaders in the national and international pro-life movement. She served as a consultant to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Pro-Life Committee under Archbishop Joseph Naumann.
Research Authored
Testimony of CLI Associate Scholar Elizabeth Kirk, J.D. before the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee
CLI Associate Scholar Elizabeth Kirk gave a testimony at the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee's public hearing on October 22. The hearing was for HB 1957, a pro-abortion constitutional amendment that would allow minors to get abortions without parental knowledge or consent, allow abortion throughout any stage of pregnancy, and lead to taxpayer funding of abortion.
Overview of Michigan Ballot Initiative: “Right to Reproductive Freedom”
This memo is intended to identify a number of likely issues raised by the amendment, and in particular to highlight those abortion restrictions vulnerable to being struck down should the amendment pass. This memo is a high-level summary, and each issue warrants individual attention and further detailed analysis.
The Role of Adoption in Dobbs-Era Pro-Life Policy
In discussions about the Dobbs era for America, adoption is mentioned often by those across the ideological spectrum.
Abortion Jurisprudence Primer
This case, known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, presents a direct challenge to the Supreme Court’s governing precedent under Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey which hold that States may not ban pre-viability abortions.
Impact of the Strict Scrutiny Standard of Judicial Review on Abortion Legislation Under the Kansas Supreme Court’s Decision in Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt
This paper is focused on a narrow matter, namely, the nature of the standard of judicial review adopted by the Kansas Supreme Court in Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt.[2] The most important (and decisive) point to emphasize is that the standard of judicial review adopted by the court in Hodes is so rigorous that it is likely to unsettle existing abortion law in Kansas and result in a legal landscape for abortion in this state that is more permissive of abortion than either the current federal standard or the original federal standard established by Roe v. Wade.

