Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the LawAbortion

GAO: 1000+ Obamacare Plans with Taxpayer-Funded Elective Abortion Coverage & Here They Are

The non-partisan congressional watchdog agency, Government Accountability Office (GAO), released a new report late September 15 confirming that: 1,036 federally subsidized plans cover elective abortion; insurance consumers were frequently not informed of this coverage before enrolling; and plan issuers are not billing elective abortion coverage separately despite a legal requirement.

 

The report also makes public for the first timeĀ a complete list identifying every plan by name that covers elective abortionĀ and those that do not in the states that permit coverage Ā on the insurance exchanges. (This list may be accessed here by clicking ā€œAbortion Services Interactive Mapā€ on the right:Ā http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-742R.)

 

This valuable resource has been a long time coming.Ā  Former Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius promised and dodged requests for this very list three times under oath (here,Ā here, andĀ here) during Congressional hearings over the past 11 months.Ā  Her successor, Sylvia Burwell, apparently did little to follow up. Ā The GAO, which reports working on this project for seven months, did what the giant of HHS could or would not do despite its $941 billion budget, which makes it wealthier than Indonesia, the 16thĀ richest nation in the world.

 

The GAO report found:

 

  • 28Ā states allow elective abortion in Qualified Health Plans (QHP) offered on health insurance exchanges.
  • Ā 15Ā states haveĀ noĀ restrictions or limitations on the elective abortion coverage.
  • FiveĀ states offerĀ onlyĀ elective abortion plans on the exchange. There are no ā€œpro-lifeā€ plans in Connecticut, Hawaii, New Jersey Rhode Island, and Vermont. (Note: The Lozier Institute also found this to be the case when researching the first four states; however, Vermont proved particularly difficult as one insurance companyĀ provided conflicting responsesĀ via four different representatives and did not make available any abortion policy document upon request.)
  • 1,036Ā QHPs cover elective abortion.
  • 87 percent of the 5.4 million Americans who bought insurance via the exchanges used federal premium subsidies to pay for their coverage.
  • 11Ā of the 18 plan issuers interviewed as a sample did not provide abortion information to consumers before they enrolled.
  • Ā NoneĀ of the 18 plan issuers interviewed billed the abortion surcharge separately per the law or itemized the fee clearly as abortion.Ā 
  • OneĀ plan issuer was not aware at all of the requirement to file an abortion segregation plan with its state department detailing its abortion accounting methods.

 

This, after almost one full year of individuals and families enrolling in and paying for their health insurance.

 

The present situation above ā€“ and Lozierā€™sĀ latestĀ findings ā€“ on the lack of segregation of abortion funds directly violates that provision in the Affordable Care Act. Even the author of this billing arrangement provision, Sen. Ben Nelson,Ā explainedĀ clearly in 2009:

 

“If you are receiving Federal assistance to buy insurance, and if that plan has any abortion coverage, the insurance company must bill you separatelyā€¦ Now, let me say that again. You have to write two checks: one for the basic policy and one for the additional coverage for abortion.”

 

HHS has responded to the report by acknowledging that ā€œadditional clarification may be needed.ā€ It promised that its Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would ā€œaddress issues of concernā€ and ā€œspeak directly with the QHPs or state Departments regarding the issues identified by GAO to determine whether additional guidance is necessaryā€ for states and issuers to understand the laws. Regardless of any proposed technical or logistical ā€œfixes,ā€ however, the heart of the matter is the troubling issue that this ā€œmedical procedureā€ that intentionally takes a human life ā€“ unlike any other medical procedure ā€“ is being sold as ā€œhealthcare.ā€

 

Genevieve Plaster is a research assistant at the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Latest Posts

November 13, 2024 IVF Industry Regulation in the United States: Changes Are Needed to Protect Embryonic Children and their Families November 13, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Alabama (2023) November 13, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Missouri (2022)

You Might Also Be Interested In

IVF Industry Regulation in the United States: Changes Are Needed to Protect Embryonic Children and their Families

November 13, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Pro-Life Laws Arenā€™t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality

November 8, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

ACOG Peddles Disinformation About Pro-Life Laws, Plays Politics With Women’s Lives

October 11, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image