Use our new account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

AbortionLife & the Law

Justice Not Sought for Unborn Victims of Violence

A recent pretrial hearing of Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan provides the opportunity to again raise the question as to why prosecutors are not seeking justice for all the victims of the 2009 massacre.

 

 

At the hearing, attorneys for Hasan again confirmed their client’s willingness to plead guilty to 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.

 

 

However, under federal law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (§919a Article 119a), there was a 14th victim – the unborn child of Army Private Francheska Velez, herself killed in the shooting.

 

 

The 2004 Unborn Victims of Violence Act (UVVA)makes the killing or injuring of an unborn child during the commission of a crime a criminal offense, and allows for the prosecution of an individual who, intentionally or not, kills or injures an unborn child.

 

 

This is exactly what happened during the Fort Hood massacre (and, incidentally, during the Aurora theater shooting, albeit Colorado is one of the minority of states that do not have an unborn victims’ law); it is a clear instance of what originally prompted lawmakers to pass UVVA.  According to a witness, Pvt. Velez’s last words before dying were, “My baby, my baby.”

 

 

Despite the UVVA, prosecutors are refusing to hold Hasan responsible for the shooting death of that baby.  Pvt. Valez’s child may have been unborn but not, in the eyes of the law, unrecognized.  It makes no difference to the applicability of the UVVA that a gun was used in this crime, but that fact only heightens the irony of the present circumstance.

 

 

Pvt. Valez’s last words and last concern were for the child she was carrying.  Prosecutors owe it to her memory to seek justice for that child as for all the victims of the Fort Hood shootings.

 

Gene Tarne is a Senior Analyst at Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Latest Posts

February 1, 2023 Abortion Reporting: Hawaii (2020) January 30, 2023 Abortion Reporting: Pennsylvania (2021) January 27, 2023 Abortion Reporting: Maine (2021)

You Might Also Be Interested In

Abortion Reporting: Hawaii (2020)

February 1, 2023

Abortion Reporting: Pennsylvania (2021)

January 30, 2023

Abortion Reporting: Maine (2021)

January 27, 2023

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-
class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image