Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.


Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the Law

New Michigan Laws Deter and Punish Coerced Abortion

Proponents of abortion are all about “choice.” Yet in many cases, it seems, a woman’s decision to procure an abortion does not feel like much of a choice at all.


The best estimates indicate that somewhere between 30 to over 60 percent of women seeking abortions in the United States do so under pressure—from the father of her child, her parents, her family members, friends, or employer.[1] One study shows that up to 64 percent of women who had undergone an abortion reported that they were pressured to do so.[2] What can be done to counteract this phenomenon of coerced abortions? Coerced abortions are especially harmful to women—not only does the voice of the unborn child, who cannot plead on his own behalf, go unheard, but also the voice of the mother is muted by outside pressure.[3]

MI state flag
[Michigan state flag]
Governor Rick Snyder of Michigan signed into law on June 9 two bills designed to protect women from being pressured to abort their children against their will. House Bill 4787 establishes that no individual, knowing that a woman is pregnant, may “coerce her to have an abortion against her will.”[4] House Bill 4830 reinforces the first bill by establishing further punishments for coercing a woman “to have an abortion against her will.”[5] The first bill makes more overt forms of coercion, such as assault or stalking, felonies punishable by prison time, while the second bill makes less overt pressure, such as threatening to withhold financial aid or employment, a misdemeanor punishable by fines of $5,000 to $10,000.


As a result of the new laws, facilities performing abortions in Michigan will be required to notify women that coercion to abort is illegal, as well as to screen women to discover if they have been coerced.[6]


At least 12 states considered measures to curb coerced abortions during the 2015 legislative season, including Arkansas, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Texas, and Washington. North Dakota passed its own law prior to the recent passage of similar legislation in Michigan.


Eighteeen states require abortion facilities to provide either written materials, verbal notification, or both to advise women that abortion cannot be coerced. These include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia (where notification is included in written materials but is not mandated by state law), and Wisconsin.[8] Fourteen of these states have made coercion to abort illegal, while Missouri, North Carolina, South Dakota, and West Virginia require that women who report feeling pressured to abort be given resources and information directing them towards help, but do not impose unique penalties for coercion to abort. Delaware, Minnesota, and Nebraska also forbid coerced abortions, meaning that 17 states now have such laws on the books.


Michigan’s new laws reflect a model for other states to follow in seeking to curb coercive pressure on women that may lead them to seek an abortion. By providing a framework for the detection and punishment of coercion, these laws serve to protect the interests not only of the children whose lives will be saved by a reduced number of forced abortions, but also of the women who otherwise might be pressured into aborting a child and carrying the burden of that loss with them for the rest of their lives.


Tim Bradley is a research associate at the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

[1], citing a Guttmacher report, and


[3], Page 11





[8] and

Latest Posts

June 3, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Arkansas (2023) May 29, 2024 Abortion Reporting: West Virginia (2023) May 29, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Indiana (2023)

You Might Also Be Interested In

United Kingdom Data Deficiencies Influencing U.S. FDA Decisions

United Kingdom Data Deficiencies Influencing U.S. FDA Decisions

May 23, 2024
ClosePlease login

Misleading Statements About “Life of the Mother” Exceptions in Pro-life Laws Require Correction

Gestational Limits on Abortion in the United States Compared to International Norms (April 2024)

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.