Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

General

Pro-Life Laws Aren’t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality

After a JAMA Pediatrics research letter identified notable national increases in infant mortality following the Dobbs decision, pro-abortion media were quick to blame pro-life laws. The reaction mirrored the response to a JAMA Pediatrics article from June reporting that infant deaths rose 12.7 percent above expectation in Texas following the implementation of its Heartbeat Act.

These knee-jerk reactions were rooted in uncritical analyses that serve only to push the pro-abortion lobby’s talking points.

Infant mortality, defined as death in the first year of birth, has been unacceptably high in the U.S. for many decades. The U.S. consistently ranks near the bottom of developed countries on this metric. The data provided in these studies, however, do nothing to justify laying blame on pro-life laws.

Continue Reading at National Review >>

Latest Posts

March 28, 2025 Is relief the most common reaction to abortion? Self-assessed intensity of emotions attributed to abortion in a national sample of women aged 41 to 45 Is relief the most common reaction to abortion? Self-assessed intensity of emotions attributed to abortion in a national sample of women aged 41 to 45 March 24, 2025 Methodology: Federally Qualified Health Center versus Planned Parenthood Locations, 2025 Methodology: Federally Qualified Health Center versus Planned Parenthood Locations, 2025 March 17, 2025 Supporting Mothers, Strengthening Futures: Reforming Arkansas’s Policies for Families with Young Children

You Might Also Be Interested In

Methodology: Federally Qualified Health Center versus Planned Parenthood Locations, 2025

Methodology: Federally Qualified Health Center versus Planned Parenthood Locations, 2025

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 24, 2025
Please login to bookmark Close
Charlotte Lozier Institute Scholars Begin Arbitration to Defend Science Against Publisher Retractions

Charlotte Lozier Institute Scholars Begin Arbitration to Defend Science Against Publisher Retractions

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 3, 2025
Please login to bookmark Close

Scientists Sue Publisher Over Retractions Of Studies Showing Dangers Of Abortion Pills

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
October 4, 2024
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image