Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Search Icon
Search Icon
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the LawAbortion

Removal of “Sexual and Reproductive Health” Language from UN Resolution: What the Media Got Wrong

Many mainstream media outlets are unfairly criticizing the Trump administration for removing the phrase “Sexual and Reproductive Health” from a United Nations resolution on sexual violence. Such a policy change was necessary to ensure that this resolution did not support legal abortion. Many organizations affiliated with the United Nations including the United Nations Population Fund and the World Health Organization have used the phrase “Sexual and Reproductive Health” as a way to either directly or indirectly promote legal abortion. In fact, the website for the World Health Organization’s European office includes abortion as a specific area of work underneath “Sexual and Reproductive Health.”

 

Since taking office, the Trump administration has taken the lead to ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars are neither funding abortion nor weakening pro-life laws in other countries. Their decision to strengthen and expand the Mexico City Policy has significantly reduced taxpayer complicity in global abortion. Furthermore, these Trump administration policy changes have not reduced the overall amount of U.S. funding for global health assistance. Instead, these policy changes have prioritized maternal care, prenatal care, and other programs that ensure adequate nutrition and medical care for mothers and children, rather than abortion.

 

Furthermore, claims by CNN and other news outlets that the Mexico City policy has increased overseas abortion rates are misleading. Abortion data from developing countries is often incomplete and unreliable. Indeed, the studies which claim that the Mexico City Policy increased the incidence of abortion have many missing data points, as I made clear in a piece for National Review. Furthermore, the data they do analyze often reveals implausibly large annual fluctuations in the incidence of abortion. In reality, a substantial body of research illustrates that defunding organizations that perform abortions is an effective strategy for lowering abortion rates. The Trump administration should be applauded for its efforts to help build a culture of life internationally.

Latest Posts

June 10, 2026 A red vehicle passes in front of a brick building with a Planned Parenthood sign above the entrance. EXCLUSIVE: Many Women Blindsided By Abortion Pill Complications, New Study Shows June 10, 2026 A doctor in a white coat uses a digital tablet to show information to a patient across a desk. The patient's hands are clasped. New Study Finds Informed Consent Gaps for Abortion Drugs as Women Report Unexpected Pain, Bleeding June 9, 2026 A pregnant woman stands indoors by a window with white curtains, gently holding her belly and looking outside. Natural light fills the room, reflecting hope for improving interventions for substance use disorder in pregnant women. Substance Use Disorder in Pregnant Women: State of the Problem, Treatment, and Recommendations for Improving Interventions

You Might Also Be Interested In

A large crowd gathers in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., under a clear blue sky, as discussions on trends and the Dobbs decision unfold amid visible columns and flags.

What Should We Expect in Maternal Mortality Trends Due to the Dobbs Decision?

June 4, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
Row of parked American cars in a parking lot, photographed from the rear at sunset, with warm sunlight reflecting off the SUVs.

Fact of Life: American Cars (and Their Drivers) Exhibit Decidedly More Pro-life than Pro-choice Views

June 2, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
A woman sits at a wooden table with a laptop and phone, gazing thoughtfully out a window. Sunlight filters through sheer curtains, and a green potted plant is beside her as she researches online abortion drug access in post-Dobbs America.

An Overview of Online Abortion Drug Access in Post-Dobbs America

May 26, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image