Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the LawAbortion

Slate Oversimplifies and Obscures U.S. Abortion Law Radicalism

In an article published November 6 in Slate, columnist Joshua Keating asks the question, “How do America’s abortion laws compare to the rest of the world’s?” In light of the recent mid-term elections which saw an increase of pro-life legislators elected to Congress and the state houses, Keating’s look at international abortion limitations is timely.  He relies on information from a new report released by the Center for Reproductive Rights, which favors legal abortion.

 

The Center for Reproductive Rights divide the various nations according to level of restriction from completely banned/only allowed to save the life of the mother all the way to countries “without restriction due to reason.”  Countries included in the former category include Ireland, Mexico, and a number of mostly developing nations.  Countries in the latter category include the majority of industrialized and post-Soviet nations.  It is in this category that the United States is classified.

 

The problem with this manner of classification is that it does not accurately answer the question of how America’s abortion laws truly compare to the rest of the world’s.  This classification makes it appear that the United States’ policies are in step with the rest of the industrialized elites.  However, this is misleading.

 

As made clear in a recent report from the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI), the United States is far more permissive in terms of legal abortion than almost all other countries of the world.  The accurate answer to Keating’s initial question would be that America stands far outside the international mainstream in permitting late-term abortions, essentially to the time of birth.

 

The United States is one of only seven countries in the world that permits elective abortion beyond 20 weeks, which is more than halfway through pregnancy and the time (and perhaps earlier) at which research shows that the baby is capable of feeling pain.  The only other countries that stand in the same category include China, North Korea, Singapore, Vietnam, the Netherlands, and Canada.

 

The CLI review of international abortion statutes shows that most of the countries that the Center for Reproductive Rights lumps together with the U.S. actually place more limitations regarding abortion based on duration of pregnancy.  The norm among countries that allow elective abortion is to limit it at 20 weeks gestation, though elective abortion is more often limited to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, that is, the first trimester.

 

It is misleading to classify the United States with these other nations’ far more limited abortion policies.  The U.S. is more accurately categorized as an outlier with ultra-permissive abortion policies.  The CRR report laments the limited restriction currently placed on abortion in the States but fails to note that even should the U.S. move closer to the international mainstream and adopt a 20-week abortion policy, it would still be among the top 4% in regard to permissive abortion laws.

 

In the last year polling from Quinnipiac, National Journal, Huffington Post, NBC/Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post/ABC all found that a majority of Americans support limiting abortion at 20 weeks’ gestation.  Additionally a higher percentage of women than men support such limitations.

 

If the United States really wants to keep in step with other industrialized nations, then the way forward is clear: move away from the extreme fringe in terms of abortion policy and begin to embrace norms that reflect a higher degree of respect for human life at every stage of development.

 

Nora Sullivan is a research assistant for the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Latest Posts

May 13, 2024 New Study Reveals FDA Relied on Cherrypicked Data to Approve Dangerous Mail-Order Abortion Drugs New Study Reveals FDA Relied on Cherrypicked Data to Approve Dangerous Mail-Order Abortion Drugs May 9, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Oklahoma (2023) April 30, 2024 Gestational Limits on Abortion in the United States Compared to International Norms (April 2024)

You Might Also Be Interested In

Gestational Limits on Abortion in the United States Compared to International Norms (April 2024)

A Fact-Free Campaign Against Parents and Unborn Children in Alabama

April 22, 2024
ClosePlease login

Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in Idaho’s Moyle v. United States EMTALA Case

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 25, 2024
ClosePlease login

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image