Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Search Icon
Search Icon
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Maternal & Public HealthAbortion International Journal of Women's Health

A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization Following a First Pregnancy Abortion or Birth

James Studnicki, Tessa Longbons, John Fisher, David C. Reardon, Ingrid Skop, Christina A. Cirucci, Donna J. Harrison, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze, Zbigniew Ras

 

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether exposure to a first pregnancy outcome of induced abortion, compared to a live birth, is associated with an increased risk and likelihood of mental health morbidity.

Materials and methods: Participants were continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999, and assigned to either of two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome, abortion (n = 1331) or birth (n = 3517), and followed through to 2015. Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions, and hospital days of stay. Exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome, a total of 17 years, were determined for each cohort.

Findings: Women with first pregnancy abortions, compared to women with births, had higher risk and likelihood of experiencing all three mental health outcome events in the transition from pre- to post-pregnancy outcome periods: outpatient visits (RR 2.10, CL 2.08-2.12 and OR 3.36, CL 3.29-3.42); hospital inpatient admissions (RR 2.75, CL 2.38-3.18 and OR 5.67, CL 4.39-7.32); hospital inpatient days of stay (RR 7.38, CL 6.83-7.97 and OR 19.64, CL 17.70-21.78). On average, abortion cohort women experienced shorter exposure time before (6.43 versus 7.80 years), and longer exposure time after (10.57 versus 9.20 years) the first pregnancy outcome than birth cohort women. Utilization rates before the first pregnancy outcome, for all three utilization events, were higher for the birth cohort than for the abortion cohort.

Conclusion: A first pregnancy abortion, compared to a birth, is associated with significantly higher subsequent mental health services utilization following the first pregnancy outcome. The risk attributable to abortion is notably higher for inpatient than outpatient mental health services. Higher mental health utilization before the first pregnancy outcome for birth cohort women challenges the explanation that pre-existing mental health history explains mental health problems following abortion, rather than the abortion itself.

Read Complete Article

Latest Posts

September 4, 2026 A green gradient graph with a yellow line showing an upward trend on a wavy background, with a subtle light source in the top left corner—visually representing the changes in abortions in America post-Dobbs and highlighting the 2026 update. How Many Abortions Are Occurring in America Post-Dobbs? A September 2026 Update September 1, 2026 Aerial view of a grand capitol building with a central dome, surrounded by trees and city streets, with mountains in the background under a clear sky—the seat of the Idaho Board of Medicine, recently noted in cases such as Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine concerning debates over the federal right to abortion. A New Federal Right to Abortion? Assessing Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine August 7, 2026 A hand in a blue glove holds a box labeled Mifepristone Tablets with a barcode and description stating its use for pregnancy termination and medical abortion, while recent controversies have brought increased attention to both Mifepristone and its uses beyond abortion. Uses for Mifepristone Beyond Abortion: Addressing Recent Controversies

You Might Also Be Interested In

Aerial view of a grand capitol building with a central dome, surrounded by trees and city streets, with mountains in the background under a clear sky—the seat of the Idaho Board of Medicine, recently noted in cases such as Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine concerning debates over the federal right to abortion.

A New Federal Right to Abortion? Assessing Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine

September 1, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
A hand in a blue glove holds a box labeled Mifepristone Tablets with a barcode and description stating its use for pregnancy termination and medical abortion, while recent controversies have brought increased attention to both Mifepristone and its uses beyond abortion.

Uses for Mifepristone Beyond Abortion: Addressing Recent Controversies

August 7, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
A woman in a hospital gown is in labor, holding someone's hand for support while medical staff assist during childbirth, closely monitoring for any medical indications that might require separating mother and unborn child.

Fact Sheet: Medical Indications for Separating a Mother and Her Unborn Child

July 20, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image