Search Icon
Search Icon
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Maternal & Public Health

Assembly Bill 315 is an overly broad attack on pro-life pregnancy centers

As Albert Einstein once said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

Lawmakers in California would do well to heed the words of the Nobel laureate and preeminent scientist of the 20th century. While community-based, pro-life pregnancy centers are forced to spend tens of thousands of dollars to protect themselves from violent, anti-woman attacks, they now face an additional and repetitive attack – not from masked and hooded vandals, but from their own elected representatives.

This prompts the question: Are California lawmakers insane for repeatedly proposing regulations against, and failing to protect, pro-life pregnancy centers? If we look at Einstein’s definition, the clear answer is yes.

Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan’s proposed Assembly Bill 315 would enable limitless fines against community-based pregnancy centers for supposed violations. This vague and overly broad bill, like its predecessors, suffers from serious constitutional problems. Between 2007-2020, similar bills have been considered and rejected in nine states (Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Oregon, Texas,Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia).

Continue Reading at The Orange County Register>>

Latest Posts

November 9, 2026 Minimalist illustration of a small, flat-roofed building serving as a United States abortion center, featuring two windows and a central door. Fact Sheet: Gestational Breakdown of Brick-and-Mortar Abortion Centers in The United States October 6, 2026 A magnifying glass rests on three wooden blocks that spell out FDA, symbolizing a review of the REMS modification. A Critical Analysis of the FDA’s 2021 Mifepristone REMS Modification Rationale Review October 6, 2026 Ultrasound image showing the side profile of a human baby Inside The Government Decision That Opened Up Abortion Pill Floodgates

You Might Also Be Interested In

A graphic showing an outline of Kentucky with the text KENTUCKY ABORTION STATISTICS centered over it, detailing 2022 abortion data.

Abortion Reporting: Kentucky (2025)

An outline of the state of Alabama with the text ALABAMA ABORTION STATISTICS centered over it, reflecting current abortion reporting.

Abortion Reporting: Alabama (2025)

Text reading Virginia Abortion Statistics, providing 2022 abortion data, centered over a light gray silhouette of the state of Virginia inside a white circle on a blue background.

Abortion Reporting: Virginia (2024)

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image