Search Icon
Search Icon
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Abortion Drugs

Texas Lawsuit Seeks to Take at-Home Abortion Pills Off the Market Nationwide

Both sides of the abortion issue are waiting for a federal judge in Texas to rule on a lawsuit that could force the FDA to withdraw chemical abortion pills from the market.

This case follows the FDA’s decision to expand access to the two-part drug regimen, allowing doctors to prescribe it via telehealth appointments for women to receive the abortion-inducing pills through the mail.

The Texas lawsuit claims mifepristone, the first of the two drugs taken to induce abortion, is not as safe as advertised and should not have received FDA approval back in 2000.

These chemical procedures currently account for more than 50% of all abortions in the United States. For many years, the FDA sought to expand access to the two-part at-home pill regimen even though a number of doctors and medical organizations question its safety and its approval more than two decades ago.

“From approval and then every time the FDA has loosened its restrictions, it has gone against its own rules to do so,” Dr. Ingrid Skop from the Charlotte Lozier Institute told CBN News.

Dr. Skop says it was initially approved under a category called “subpart h” which is for drugs that treat life-threatening illnesses…

Continue Reading at CBN >>

Latest Posts

October 6, 2026 A magnifying glass rests on three wooden blocks that spell out FDA, symbolizing a review of the REMS modification. A Critical Analysis of the FDA’s 2021 Mifepristone REMS Modification Rationale Review October 6, 2026 Ultrasound image showing the side profile of a human baby Inside The Government Decision That Opened Up Abortion Pill Floodgates October 6, 2026 A sign for the FDA featuring the agency’s logo and circular seals in front of a brick government building, where clinical guidance for mifepristone REMS is often determined. Unintended Consequences of the FDA’s 2021-2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Changes to Mifepristone

You Might Also Be Interested In

A magnifying glass rests on three wooden blocks that spell out FDA, symbolizing a review of the REMS modification.

A Critical Analysis of the FDA’s 2021 Mifepristone REMS Modification Rationale Review

Ultrasound image showing the side profile of a human baby

Inside The Government Decision That Opened Up Abortion Pill Floodgates

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
October 6, 2026
A sign for the FDA featuring the agency’s logo and circular seals in front of a brick government building, where clinical guidance for mifepristone REMS is often determined.

Unintended Consequences of the FDA’s 2021-2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Changes to Mifepristone

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image