Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the LawAbortion

Massachusetts’ Draconian Abortion Proposal

This is Issue 31 of the On Point Series.

 

Introduction

 

In the first few months of 2019, with the prospect of a Supreme Court that is more willing to defer to state judgments about abortion law, several states have moved to adopt statutes and/or constitutional amendments that enshrine abortion rights in state law.  While these proposals[1] are advancing in states that do not presently have many meaningful protections for unborn children and their mothers, legislators and citizens should vehemently reject the elimination of virtually all state recognition of unborn children as human beings.

 

Massachusetts bills H. 3320 and S. 1209 would codify a right to abortion through nine months of pregnancy in Bay State law and repeal the state’s meager existing protections for unborn children and their mothers. However, because of a decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and the presence of an undefined health exception in the state’s viability law, abortion is essentially legal through all nine months of pregnancy in Massachusetts today.

 

The chart below compares current Massachusetts law to the law as it will stand if this legislation is enacted.

 

Here is a summary:

  • Any mention of unborn children will be removed from the definitions, effectively removing their recognition as living humans.
  • No restrictions will be permitted on abortions before 24 weeks post-implantation (around 27 weeks, LMP, that is from the estimated commencement of the last menstrual period); no bans will be permitted on specific procedures, telemedicine, abortion-inducing drug regimens, and more.
  • Abortion providers can provide virtually any reason to justify abortions at or after 24 weeks. Further, there will no longer be a requirement for abortion providers to provide the justifications to anyone.
  • No criminal penalties for performing abortion.
  • No reflection requirements will be permitted prior to an abortion.
  • Existing law encourages abortion providers to try to save both the lives of the mother and the viable unborn child by using a procedure that could lead to live birth. An explicitly listed requirement to accomplish this is to have life-supporting equipment present in the procedure room. These provisions will be repealed.
  • Any abortion reporting will be subject to the will of the department of public health.
  • A requirement that abortions after 13 weeks be performed in hospitals was repealed in 2018. This legislation also repeals the requirement that abortions at or after 24 weeks be performed in hospitals.
  • The strongest informed consent provisions in the state’s current law are already enjoined. This legislation would also repeal parental consent requirements.    
  • Abortion will be covered under the state medical assistance program for uninsured women who do not otherwise meet criteria for the program and are at or below 200% of the federal poverty level.

 

  Mary E. Harned, J.D. is an associate scholar for the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

 

[1] Proposals to enact statutes or adopt constitutional amendments that expansively permit abortion until birth and repeal existing limits and health standards for the procedure have been enacted, considered and rejected, or remain under consideration in at least: Illinois, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

 

Latest Posts

December 10, 2024 A Defense of New Jersey Pregnancy Centers: Responding to Planned Parenthood Misinformation November 27, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Massachusetts (2023) November 27, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Maine (2023)

You Might Also Be Interested In

A Defense of New Jersey Pregnancy Centers: Responding to Planned Parenthood Misinformation

December 10, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

The Treatment of Human Embryos Created through IVF: The U.S. and 15 Selected Countries’ Regulations

November 22, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

IVF Industry Regulation in the United States: Changes Are Needed to Protect Embryonic Children and their Families

November 13, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image