Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Search Icon
Search Icon
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the Law

Statement in Opposition to Raised S.B. No. 835

Despite the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in NIFLA v. Becerra, 585 U.S.___ (2018), which struck down a California law regarding pro-life pregnancy help centers, some jurisdictions continue to weigh bills that infringe on those centers’ First Amendment rights. In February, Charlotte Lozier Institute associate scholar Jeanneane Maxon, J.D., testified as a private citizen on the constitutional and policy problems afflicting RB 835, a Connecticut bill that would authorize the state Attorney General to bring actions against pregnancy centers for putatively “deceptive” advertising practices. Laws based on this premise have been struck down in courts across the country, but organizations like NARAL and Planned Parenthood continue to pursue them with the goal of closing down these life-affirming nonprofits. Jeanneane Maxon, a former general counsel for Care Net and Americans United for Life, addresses the defects in this proposed law.

 

The full text of the testimony can be accessed online here: Full testimony

Latest Posts

September 30, 2026 At 50, the Hyde Amendment’s lifesaving legacy needs defending At 50, the Hyde Amendment’s lifesaving legacy needs defending September 30, 2026 Abortion Reporting: Oregon (2025) September 25, 2026 Peer-Reviewed Research on Online Narratives About Abortion Drugs Peer-Reviewed Research on Online Narratives About Abortion Drugs

You Might Also Be Interested In

At 50, the Hyde Amendment’s lifesaving legacy needs defending

At 50, the Hyde Amendment’s lifesaving legacy needs defending

September 30, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Fact Sheet: Fetal Development Education in the United States

September 15, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
An orange life ring with silver reflective stripes floats on the surface of calm water, much like how ongoing discussions about the Hyde Amendment impact continue to ripple through society.

Hyde Turns 50: Analyzing the Impact of the Hyde Amendment, with 2026 Addendum

September 14, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image