Search Icon
Search Icon
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Policy Paper

Research Type: Policy Paper

Sort 185 results by:

Filter Applied. Clear All

Latest Posts

October 6, 2026 A Critical Analysis of the FDA’s 2021 Mifepristone REMS Modification Rationale Review A Critical Analysis of the FDA’s 2021 Mifepristone REMS Modification Rationale Review October 6, 2026 Inside The Government Decision That Opened Up Abortion Pill Floodgates Inside The Government Decision That Opened Up Abortion Pill Floodgates October 6, 2026 Unintended Consequences of the FDA’s 2021-2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Changes to Mifepristone Unintended Consequences of the FDA’s 2021-2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Changes to Mifepristone
Reset All Filters
Life & the Law

Defunding Big Abortion: Can Alternatives Fill the Gap?

Poised to lose state and federal funding, Planned Parenthood has argued it’s irreplaceable and that alternative providers cannot absorb its entire Medicaid client base, particularly contraceptive clients. These concerns are unwarranted. Thousands of alternative providers, including federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, and doctor’s offices, provide comprehensive health care that Planned Parenthood doesn’t and are important options that can help fill any gaps.

Life & the Law

Strengthening the Pro-Life Safety Net: Childcare for Pregnant and Parenting Women in Need

Pregnant and parenting women in need (PPWIN) often face barriers to adequate childcare, including but not limited to trust, affordability, availability, location, and hours. Careful reform of federal programs serving low-income populations to improve PPWIN access to childcare, alongside a smarter allocation of existing federal resources to childcare focused on the population, could help build a pro-life safety net that meets the needs of expectant and new mothers, including on the critical childcare challenge.

Abortion

Empowering Parents Following a Prenatal Diagnosis

In this article, issues related to prenatal diagnosis are explored, including the ways in which many popular and medical biases may negatively impact how prenatal diagnoses are handled, technological advancements in treating some of these diagnoses, and how families can move forward in hope and in a way that respects life.

Fetal Tissue, Stem Cells & Bioethics

Alternatives to In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for Overcoming Infertility and Delivering a Healthy Baby

This paper reviews multiple alternatives to IVF for overcoming infertility. Many of the methods discussed in this paper are less costly and more therapeutic for the patient than IVF, yet IVF is routinely offered as the first-line “treatment” without seriously investigating or attempting to address underlying causes of infertility.

Life & the Law

How Many Abortions Are Occurring in America Post-Dobbs?

This paper provides, for the first time, a holistic overview of abortion provision in post-Dobbs America. It systematically collects point-in-time totals for the different types of abortionists and examines, in depth, which estimates are the most complete and definitive.

Life & the Law

Supporting Mothers, Strengthening Futures: Reforming Arkansas’s Policies for Families with Young Children

This paper explores reforms that could be implemented to strengthen support for families and children in need in Arkansas.

Life & the Law

Are Pro-life Laws Harming Women and Children? An Examination of Claims Against Texas

Texas is often the subject of interest and criticism. The Texas Heartbeat Act was the first strong protection of unborn life allowed while Roe was in effect, and an even stronger protection, the Texas Human Life Protection Act, was enforced following the overturn of Roe. Much media attention has been focused on potential adverse events these laws might cause. Immediately after Texas enacted stronger gestational age limitations, pro-abortion media advocates began a campaign of accusations. In this paper, the most notable of these objections will be addressed.

Life & the Law

Why the Global Protect Life Rule is Right for the U.S. and Nations around the World (2025 Update)

The Mexico City Policy, first introduced in 1984, prohibited U.S. funds for family planning from going to foreign nongovernmental organizations that perform or promote abortion as a method of family planning. In 2017, President Trump restored the MCP and expanded it through Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance, commonly known as the “Global Protect Life Rule," which significantly decreased the amount of taxpayer dollars going to organizations that promote or perform abortion. After Biden rescinded the Rule during his administration, on January 24, 2025, President Trump restored it to ensure that U.S. taxpayer funding is no longer used to promote abortion overseas. The U.S. has shown it can continue to meet critical healthcare needs for women while refusing to pay for the killing of the unborn.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image