Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Search Icon
Search Icon
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Maternal & Public HealthAbortion Cureus

The Effects of Abortion Decision Rightness and Decision Type on Women’s Satisfaction and Mental Health

CLI Summary

The Turnaway study reported that 99% of women answered “yes” to the question, “Given your situation, was the decision to have an abortion the right decision for you?” This study explored that question with more nuance. Of women who had abortions, 33% described their abortions as wanted, 43% as inconsistent with their values and preferences, 14% as counter to their values and preferences, and 10% as coerced. Women whose abortions were inconsistent with or counter to their values and preferences were more likely to attribute negative mental and emotional effects to their abortions. Overall, 60% reported they would have preferred to give birth if they had received either more emotional support or had more financial security. Despite this, 83% mostly agreed with the statement that abortion was the right decision given their situation, which demonstrates that this statement does not indicate decision satisfaction; it more likely reflects whether women felt like they did the best they could given the situation they were in. In fact, most women who agreed with the statement would have preferred to give birth.

Abstract

Background

A case series report based on the Turnaway Study has previously concluded that 99% of women with a history of abortion will continue to affirm satisfaction with their decisions to abort. Those findings have been called into question due to a low participation rate (31%) and reliance on a single yes/no assessment of decision satisfaction.

Aim

To utilize more sensitive scales in assessing decision satisfaction and the associated mental health outcomes women attribute to their abortions.

Method

A retrospective survey was completed by 1,000 females, aged 41-45, living in the United States. The survey instrument included 11 visual analog scales for respondents to rate their personal preferences and outcomes they attributed to their abortion decisions. A categorical question allowed women to identify if their abortions were wanted and consistent with their own values and preferences, inconsistent with their values and preferences, unwanted, or coerced. Linear regression models were tested to identify which of three decision scales best predicted positive or negative emotions, effects on mental health, emotional attachment, personal preferences, moral conflict, and other factors relevant to an assessment of satisfaction with a decision to abort.

Results

Of 226 women reporting a history of abortion, 33% identified it as wanted, 43% as accepted but inconsistent with their values and preferences, and 24% as unwanted or coerced. Only wanted abortions were associated with positive emotions or mental health gains. All other groups attributed more negative emotions and mental health outcomes to their abortions. Sixty percent reported they would have preferred to give birth if they had received more support from others or had more financial security.

Conclusions

Perceived pressure to abort is strongly associated with women attributing more negative mental health outcomes to their abortions. The one-third of women for whom abortion is wanted and consistent with their values and preferences are most likely over-represented in studies initiated at abortion clinics. More research is needed to understand better the experience of the two-thirds of women for whom abortion is unwanted, coerced, or otherwise inconsistent with their own values and preferences.

Read Press Release

Read Complete Article

Latest Posts

September 16, 2026 A person with pink nail polish holds a glass of water in one hand and a white pill in the other, their head bowed down, partially obscured by their hair—a quiet moment that reflects many women’s experiences as shared through online narratives about medication abortion. Examining women’s experiences with medication abortion: a critical inquiry of women’s online narratives post-Dobbs September 15, 2026 A doctor shows a tablet to a young woman patient sitting beside her in a medical office; the two appear to be discussing health information together. New Study: Abortion, Natural Pregnancy Loss Are Risk Factors for Future Maternal Complications September 15, 2026 Fact Sheet: Fetal Development Education in the United States

You Might Also Be Interested In

A person with pink nail polish holds a glass of water in one hand and a white pill in the other, their head bowed down, partially obscured by their hair—a quiet moment that reflects many women’s experiences as shared through online narratives about medication abortion.

Examining women’s experiences with medication abortion: a critical inquiry of women’s online narratives post-Dobbs

September 16, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
A doctor shows a tablet to a young woman patient sitting beside her in a medical office; the two appear to be discussing health information together.

New Study: Abortion, Natural Pregnancy Loss Are Risk Factors for Future Maternal Complications

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
September 15, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
Aerial view of a grand capitol building with a central dome, surrounded by trees and city streets, with mountains in the background under a clear sky—the seat of the Idaho Board of Medicine, recently noted in cases such as Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine concerning debates over the federal right to abortion.

A New Federal Right to Abortion? Assessing Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine

September 1, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image