Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Life & the LawAbortion

U.S. House Constitution Subcommittee Addresses CIANA

March was an important month for key legislation concerning human life and family life in the United States. On March 8, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution listened to arguments for and against the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, more commonly known as CIANA.  Dr. Michael New, adjunct scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, provided valuable testimony for the proceedings along with Teresa Collett, professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law, and the Rev. Katherine Ragsdale, President of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Mass.  Following the hearing, on March 23, the bill passed through the committee and will now is headed to the House floor.

 

CIANA would prevent the taking of minors across state lines in order to circumvent laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions.  Supporters of the bill see it as a commonsense regulation, especially as it concerns children who would be unable to get most other surgical proceedings done without the consent of their parent or guardian.  Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), chairman of the subcommittee, stressed the importance of parental involvement in the decision-making process as an unexpected pregnancy can be a tumultuous time and abortion can lead to physical, emotional, and physiological complications an adolescent can be unprepared for.

 

 

Opponents of the bill see it as unconstitutional and inimical to women’s reproductive freedom.  Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) compared CIANA to the Fugitive Slave Act, saying he “didn’t know what Frederick Douglass would think of a bill like this.”  Both Rep. Nadler and Rev. Ragsdale asserted that the home environment of a minor is often unsafe and there are cases where a parent or guardian is abusive, making it necessary for the minor to reach out to some other trusted adult for help.  However, as noted in Teresa Collett’s testimony, judicial bypasses would still be available in instances where that was the case.

 

 

Parental notification laws for abortion procedures have been found to be consistently popular with the American people.  A recent Gallup poll found that 71% of Americans support them.  As Dr. New noted, parental notification laws reduce the in-state abortion rates for minors.  These regulations reflect a common understanding that parents are primarily responsible for their minor children.  The blocking of CIANA by opponents appears to imply that unknown adults have the right to violate state law by taking someone else’s child into another state to secure an abortion for that child that would violate the law in the state of residence.  This is cause for concern especially when parental notification could potentially stop statutory rape or other abuse.  Abortion can be used to cover up evidence of the wrongdoing, returning the young girl to her abuser without her parents ever knowing she needs help.

 

 

In cases where a young girl finds herself confronting a very difficult decision, few people would advocate for her to go through the situation alone.  Collett asserts that whether the minor girl decides to terminate her pregnancy or not, it is better to have her parents helping to make the decision for the sake of her health and well-being.  “The Child Interstate Parental Notification Act has the unique virtue of building upon two of the few point of agreement in the national debate over abortion: the desirability of parental involvement in a minor’s decisions about an unplanned pregnancy, and the need to protect the physical health and safety of the pregnant girl.”

Latest Posts

March 25, 2024 Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in Idaho’s Moyle v. United States EMTALA Case March 22, 2024 Fact Sheet: Three Problems with the FDA’s Abortion Drugs Complications Data March 21, 2024 Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in SCOTUS Case FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

You Might Also Be Interested In

Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in Idaho’s Moyle v. United States EMTALA Case

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 25, 2024
ClosePlease login

Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in SCOTUS Case FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 21, 2024
ClosePlease login
Filed Brief: Zurawski v. Texas and Reasonable Medical Judgment

Filed Brief: Zurawski v. Texas and Reasonable Medical Judgment

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
March 11, 2024
ClosePlease login

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image