Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Abortion Issues in Law & Medicine

First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization

Additional authors: Christopher Craver, Zbigniew Ras

Abstract

Introduction: While both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.

Methods: Continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.

Results: Prior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.

Conclusion: Higher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.

Read Complete Article

Latest Posts

August 27, 2024 Prenatal Tax Credits and Child Support for the Unborn: A Literature Review August 27, 2024 Dobbs and Medical Deserts: Will Pro-Life Laws Drive Away Doctors and Lead to Hospital Closures? August 20, 2024 U.S. Abortion Trends: 2021-2022

You Might Also Be Interested In

U.S. Abortion Trends: 2021-2022

August 20, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Is Induced Abortion Health Care?

August 7, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Fact Check: Lozier Institute Sets the Record Straight on Evidence-Based Research

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
August 1, 2024
Please login to bookmarkClose

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image