Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Research Type:

Sort 1 results by:

Filter Applied. Clear All

Latest Posts

April 14, 2026 Drug-induced Abortion After the First Trimester Drug-induced Abortion After the First Trimester April 10, 2026 Abortion Law in America Today: Confronting Infringements on Pro-life Laws Abortion Law in America Today: Confronting Infringements on Pro-life Laws April 9, 2026 New Study: Most Women Seeking Abortion Have Higher Risk of Negative Psychological Reactions New Study: Most Women Seeking Abortion Have Higher Risk of Negative Psychological Reactions
Reset All Filters
Life & the Law

Are Pro-life Laws Harming Women and Children? An Examination of Claims Against Texas

Texas is often the subject of interest and criticism. The Texas Heartbeat Act was the first strong protection of unborn life allowed while Roe was in effect, and an even stronger protection, the Texas Human Life Protection Act, was enforced following the overturn of Roe. Much media attention has been focused on potential adverse events these laws might cause. Immediately after Texas enacted stronger gestational age limitations, pro-abortion media advocates began a campaign of accusations. In this paper, the most notable of these objections will be addressed.

Maternal & Public Health

Abortion Reporting: Iowa (2023)

Iowa’s 2023 vital statistics report, which includes the state’s abortion statistics, was published online by the Iowa Department of Public Health in January 2025. In what follows, Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) summarizes the information in the abortion report published by the state. The data published by the state does not include the total number of abortions obtained by Iowa residents out of state or the number of self-managed abortions on women outside of the healthcare system.

Maternal & Public Health

Abortion Reporting: Nevada (2023)

Nevada’s 2023 abortion statistics were provided to the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) by the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services upon request. The report shows that total abortions as well as drug-induced abortions increased significantly from 2022.

Maternal & Public Health

Abortion Reporting: Delaware (2022)

Delaware’s 2022 abortion report was published online by the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services in January 2025. The report shows that abortions decreased in 2022 from 2021.

Maternal & Public Health

Abortion Reporting: Pennsylvania (2023)

Pennsylvania’s 2023 abortion report was published online by the Pennsylvania Department of Health in December 2024. The report shows that abortions increased from the previous year.

Maternal & Public Health

Abortion Reporting: Minnesota (2023)

Minnesota’s annual abortion report for 2023 was published online by the Minnesota Department of Health in December 2024. The report shows that Minnesota’s abortion total increased from 2022. Minnesota had originally reported 12,175 abortions performed in the state in 2022, but revised its total estimate for 2022 in the state’s 2023 report. However, the state did not update the different categories of data reported by the state.

Life & the Law

Why the Global Protect Life Rule is Right for the U.S. and Nations around the World (2025 Update)

The Mexico City Policy, first introduced in 1984, prohibited U.S. funds for family planning from going to foreign nongovernmental organizations that perform or promote abortion as a method of family planning. In 2017, President Trump restored the MCP and expanded it through Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance, commonly known as the “Global Protect Life Rule," which significantly decreased the amount of taxpayer dollars going to organizations that promote or perform abortion. After Biden rescinded the Rule during his administration, on January 24, 2025, President Trump restored it to ensure that U.S. taxpayer funding is no longer used to promote abortion overseas. The U.S. has shown it can continue to meet critical healthcare needs for women while refusing to pay for the killing of the unborn.

Life & the Law

RFK Hearing: Setting the Record Straight on Pro-Life Laws

While questioning Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., implied that pro-life state laws do not allow physicians to provide emergency treatment for incomplete miscarriages.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image