Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Fetal Development

Medical and Legal Experts Testify in Support of Ohio’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act – Full Written Testimonies

On June 17, 2015, the Ohio Senate Health and Human Services Committee held a hearing on S.B. 127, the state’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. Among the experts testifying in support of the bill were Angelina Baglini Nguyen, J.D., a legal expert and Associate Scholar of the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) and Dr. Sheila Page, D.O., an osteopathic physician, board certified in Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine.

 

CLI thanks both Angelina B. Nguyen and Dr. Sheila Page for their permission to reprint the full text of their testimonies here. In addition, CLI’s Vice President and Research Director, Dr. David A. Prentice, Ph.D., submitted his testimony below in writing.

 

 

Ohio Pain-Capable bill June 17 2015 ORTL
(CLI Associate Scholar Angelina B. Nguyen, J.D. [leftmost], next to Dr. Sheila Page along with pro-life allies and Ohio Right to Life, Pain-Capable bill hearing June 17, 2015)

 

Written Testimony of David A. Prentice, Ph.D. 

Excerpt:

 

You may hear that that the science of fetal pain is disputed, quoting a JAMA review from 2005 that claims pain sensation does not develop until 29-30 weeks gestation, and requires development of a functioning cortex in the brain. That study, while widely quoted, was published by physicians with significant ties to the abortion lobby. That 2005 paper ignored numerous studies showing that the thalamus, not the cortex, is needed for pain sensation. In fact, children born without a cortex are conscious. The 2005 JAMA review also didn’t address other evidence such as studies demonstrating that premature babies feel pain as early as 20 weeks; its biased conclusions have been discredited.

 

Continue reading HERE.

 

Written Testimony of Angelina Baglini Nguyen, J.D. 

Excerpt:

 

The United States is one of only seven countries in the world that permit elective abortion past 20 weeks.

 

… An unborn child’s ability to feel pain at twenty weeks is a compelling state interest that the Court can accommodate with or without the viability rule. International law compels us to come closer to the norm of removing elective abortion from the territory of late pregnancy. This piece of legislation is neither extreme nor unreasonable, but is a well-reasoned, well-supported, and well-liked limitation on the boundaries of elective abortion in America.

 

Continue reading HERE.

 

Written Testimony of Sheila Page, D.O. 

Excerpt:

 

The fetus is physiologically equipped to perceive pain, and demonstrates physiological responses consistent with pain perception. These responses are seen at 7.5 weeks and continue to develop until birth. It is reasonable to conclude that by 8 weeks the developing human is capable of pain perception. Our ability to relate to this possibility is limited by our own narrow vision, lack of understanding, and sometimes our unwillingness to perceive that which we cannot readily see. As physicians, we are obligated to anticipate potential suffering and take action to prevent or alleviate it.

 

Continue reading HERE.

Pregnant woman- shadow

Latest Posts

July 11, 2024 Abortion Reporting: Alaska (2023) July 2, 2024 Experts: No Evidence Behind “Induced Abortion Is Evidence-Based Medical Care” Argument Experts: No Evidence Behind “Induced Abortion Is Evidence-Based Medical Care” Argument July 1, 2024 Is Induced Abortion Evidence-Based Medical Practice?

You Might Also Be Interested In

Five Facts About “Life-Limiting” Fetal Conditions

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
February 15, 2024
ClosePlease login

Tara Sander Lee | “Knit Together in a Mother’s Womb”

August 13, 2023
ClosePlease login

12 Facts at 12 Weeks

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
April 25, 2023
ClosePlease login

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image