Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
Search Icon
Search Icon
Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Maternal & Public HealthAbortion Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access

Determining the Period Prevalence and Acuity of Emergency Department Visits Following Induced Abortion Mistakenly Identified as Spontaneous Abortion: An Analytic Observational Prospective Cohort Study

Additionally co-authored by Christopher Craver

Abstract

Background

Induced abortions via mifepristone and misoprostol (medical abortion) represented 63% of abortions in the United States in 2023. Women are consistently advised to conceal their recent abortion when visiting the Emergency Department (ED). Consequently, ED visits may be mistakenly attributed to a prior spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rather than induced abortion.

Objectives

We sought to determine the period prevalence trajectory of these miscodes from 2004-2015 to 2016-2021. In addition, for the period 2016-2021, we sought to determine if there were differences in the severity or acuity of these miscoded visits compared to correctly classified post-abortion visits.

Methods

We analyzed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files (TAF) to identify 28,534 emergency department visits for all causes, and their level of acuity, following either a medical or surgical abortion within 30 days. For abortion related visits, we determined whether the visits were miscoded as a spontaneous abortion or were correctly coded.

Results

Between the two time periods, miscode period prevalence rates following medical abortion increased from 4.7% of total visits to 18.0%; and from 45.5% of abortion-related visits to 83.5%. Following surgical abortion, miscodes increased from 1.2% of all-cause visits to 7.7%; abortion-related miscodes increased from 26.8% to 73.9%. During the period 2016-2021, ED visits following medical abortion were more likely to be miscoded than visits following surgical abortion: for all-cause visits, OR 2.63, P<.001; for abortion-related visits, OR 1.79, P<.001. Miscoded ED visits had significantly higher acuity than correctly coded visits. For all-cause visits following medical abortion, OR 3.68, P<.001; for all-cause visits following surgical abortion, OR 3.39, P<.001. For abortion-related visits following medical abortion, OR 1.51, P=.006; for abortion-related visits following surgical abortion, OR 1.41, P=.03.

Discussion

Coincident with the increasing dominance of medical abortion, there is a concurrent increase in the misattribution of post-induced abortion ED visits to a spontaneous abortion. High levels of visit acuity suggest that these miscodes represent a serious risk factor. Further, these miscodes mask and statistically deflate post-abortion complication rates and undermine both the science and medical management necessary to address these issues, representing a threat to effective surveillance.

 

Read Press Release

Read Complete Article

Latest Posts

April 14, 2026 An orange pill bottle, scattered white pills, and an ultrasound photo strip rest on a textured pink fabric surface, symbolizing the experience of a medical abortion. Drug-induced Abortion After the First Trimester April 10, 2026 White capsules spilling from an open white paper package onto a wooden surface, with several capsules scattered above the package—an image evoking the ongoing debate over America’s abortion law. Abortion Law in America Today: Confronting Infringements on Pro-life Laws April 9, 2026 A woman with dark hair wearing a dark t-shirt sits against a light-colored wall, looking downcast and thoughtful, perhaps reflecting on the psychological reactions many women experience after an abortion, her face set in a neutral expression. New Study: Most Women Seeking Abortion Have Higher Risk of Negative Psychological Reactions

You Might Also Be Interested In

An orange pill bottle, scattered white pills, and an ultrasound photo strip rest on a textured pink fabric surface, symbolizing the experience of a medical abortion.

Drug-induced Abortion After the First Trimester

April 14, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
Exterior of a Planned Parenthood building at 612, featuring a large blue logo and signage on a tan brick wall, with an arched entrance and hours sign visible below. Highlighted in the 2024-25 Annual Report for its welcoming design.

Fact Sheet: Planned Parenthood’s 2024-25 Annual Report

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
April 7, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close
A white pill bottle lies on its side, spilling round beige tablets onto a white surface. Behind it, several blurred ultrasound images hint at the risks and complications associated with drug-induced abortion in this clinical, medical scene.

Primer: Risks and Complications of Drug-Induced Abortion

April 6, 2026
Please login to bookmark Close

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image